Trump Induced Tariff War: Flips and Flops Its Implications and Probable Alternative

US Trade Policy - Strategy and Consequences

Recent weeks have seen significant volatility and uncertainty surrounding US trade policy, marked by abrupt tariff announcements, subsequent postponements, and escalating rhetoric targeting both adversaries and traditional allies. This apparent pattern of policy shifts under President Trump, seemingly driven by a "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) agenda focused on unilateral gains, is creating global economic anxiety and straining long-standing international relationships. The lack of a clear, consistent strategy raises questions about the administration's approach and its potential consequences.

Join the Whatsapp Channel to Get News updates in english

A Pattern of Policy Instability

The administration's recent actions illustrate a reactive and often contradictory approach. April 2025 began with the announcement of broad 'protectionist tariffs' targeting trading partners. Faced with widespread threats of retaliation, implementation was quickly paused for 90 days for most nations, excluding China. When China defied threats and retaliated, a tit-for-tat escalation ensued, pushing tariff levels towards potentially prohibitive rates (reportedly 145% by the US and 125% by China on certain goods).

Further inconsistencies followed. High tariffs initially announced on crucial electronic imports were seemingly backtracked due to US dependence and corporate pressure, only for special tariffs on these items to be threatened again shortly after. China responded by restricting exports of rare earths, vital for semiconductor manufacturing. President Trump then threatened tariffs on previously exempt pharmaceuticals while simultaneously suggesting tariff reductions for the auto sector, an early target of high duties. This rapid succession of conflicting signals has unsettled global financial markets, contributing to wild swings and pervasive uncertainty.

Antagonising Allies, Confronting China

A core element of the current strategy appears to be dealing with trading partners individually, seeking bilateral concessions rather than engaging through multilateral frameworks like the World Trade Organization (WTO). This approach has involved confrontational tactics even against close allies like Canada and the European Union, antagonizing them from the outset. While pursuing individual deals, potentially favoring nations like India perceived as having fewer trade barriers (as suggested by Treasury Secretary Bessent), the primary focus remains on China.

The administration views the large US trade deficit with China ($440bn exports vs $145bn imports in 2024) as evidence of unfair practices and a threat to US strategic dominance. However, the aggressive tariff strategy risks significant economic blowback.

Economic Rationale and Potential Fallout

President Trump frequently cites the large US current account deficit ($1.13 trillion in 2023) as justification for tariffs, framing it as evidence of the US being disadvantaged. Critics argue this overlooks the benefits the US derives from the dollar's global reserve status ("dollarization"), which allows the nation to finance deficits and effectively live beyond its means, often benefiting from cheaper imports produced in lower-wage economies.

The imposition of broad tariffs disrupts complex global supply chains, potentially increasing costs for US manufacturers reliant on imported components and ultimately raising prices for consumers. While intended to boost domestic production, creating new capacity takes time, while the negative impacts of inflation, supply bottlenecks, and retaliatory tariffs on US exports ($3.1 trillion, 11% of GDP) could be felt much sooner. The IMF has already cautioned that the tariff war and resulting uncertainty could slow US economic growth, with broader implications potentially tipping the global economy towards stagflation or recession, especially impacting the two largest economies (US and China, accounting for ~43% of world GDP).

Risk and Global Response

The administration's trade policy faces challenges both domestically and internationally. The President's authority to impose tariffs under emergency powers is being questioned within the US and may face legal challenges. Institutions like the Federal Reserve have cautioned against the economic risks, drawing ire from the President. Internationally, the strategy of isolating and pressuring nations individually appears to be faltering as major trading partners signal readiness to retaliate. There are signs that targeted nations, including China and potentially US allies like the EU, may seek coordinated responses, potentially leveraging collective economic weight to push back against unilateral US actions and advocate for a return to a more stable, rules-based global trading order.

President Trump's pursuit of the MAGA agenda through aggressive, unilateral trade actions and confrontational rhetoric appears increasingly fraught with contradiction and risk. The strategy, based on a potentially flawed interpretation of trade deficits, has created significant global economic uncertainty, strained key alliances, and provoked retaliation. The policy flip-flops suggest a lack of clear planning, and the potential economic consequences—including inflation, supply chain disruption, and recession—could ultimately undermine US interests more than those of its targets, prompting both domestic and international pushback.